Karr v. City of New York

161 A.D.2d 449
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 17, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 161 A.D.2d 449 (Karr v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Karr v. City of New York, 161 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered May 11, 1989, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[450]*450Plaintiff was injured when she slipped and fell on the sidewalk in front of 222 West 10th Street in Manhattan and claimed that defendants, as abutting owners, were negligent in failing to properly maintain the sidewalk. Plaintiff alleged that she fell on the portion of the sidewalk where a "metal plate” was located and introduced numerous photographs of the accident site. Her claim against defendants is based on their special use of the sidewalk where the accident occurred from which they derived a special benefit. Plaintiff’s expert engineer identified two utility boxes at the site which serviced defendants’ building.

The Supreme Court denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that triable issues of fact exist regarding, inter alia, the special use of the sidewalk, whether it was the cause of the defect in the sidewalk and whether that, in turn, caused the accident.

The evidence in this case demonstrates a factual issue as to whether defendants’ use of the sidewalk was a "special use”. The duty to maintain the area of special use runs with the land and is not dependent upon a finding that defendants actually installed the sidewalk or repaired it. (Santorelli v City of New York, 77 AD2d 825.) Hence, defendants’ liability arises by virtue of their ownership of the premises which derived a special benefit from the use of the abutting sidewalk. (Supra.)

Accordingly, as there are unresolved questions in this case which include whether the defect in the sidewalk was caused by a special use and, if so, whether it caused the alleged accident, summary judgment was appropriately denied (cf., Rotuba Extruders v Ceppos, 46 NY2d 223). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Asch and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. City of Buffalo
193 N.Y.S.3d 560 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Saez v. Sapir Realty Mgt. Corp.
2020 NY Slip Op 3863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Boneventura v. 60 W. 57 Realty LLC
2018 NY Slip Op 232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Lebron v. City of New York
2016 NY Slip Op 7857 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Rodriguez v. City of Yonkers
106 A.D.3d 802 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Katz v. City of New York
18 A.D.3d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Montalvo v. Heege
301 A.D.2d 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Eliassian v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
300 A.D.2d 51 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Feldman v. Kings Hero Restaurant
270 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Thomas v. Triangle Realty Co.
255 A.D.2d 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Darnovsky v. Unusual Restaurant, Inc.
221 A.D.2d 151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Granville v. City of New York
211 A.D.2d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Schoenherr v. Ernest Seuss Realty Corp.
206 A.D.2d 358 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 A.D.2d 449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/karr-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1990.