Lebron v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lebron v. City of New York

2016 NY Slip Op 7857, 144 A.D.3d 566, 40 N.Y.S.3d 897

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 22, 2016

Docket2262 307049/11

StatusPublished

This text of 2016 NY Slip Op 7857 (Lebron v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lebron v. City of New York, 2016 NY Slip Op 7857, 144 A.D.3d 566, 40 N.Y.S.3d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ruben Franco, J.), entered on or about March 24, 2016, which granted defendant Bronx Lebanon Medical Center’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although a landowner is responsible for maintaining abutting sidewalks (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-210), it is not responsible for the curbs or ramps (see Gary v 101 Owners Corp., 89 AD3d 627 [1st Dept 2011]; Administrative Code § 19-101 [d]), unless a defect thereon was created by the landowner or occurred because of a special use (see Trent-Clark v City of New York, 114 AD3d 558 [1st Dept 2014]). The duty to maintain an area of special use is not dependent on a finding that the landowner actually installed or repaired the area, only that it derived the special benefit (see Karr v City of New York, 161 AD2d 449 [1st Dept 1990]).

The court properly concluded that Bronx Lebanon did not derive a special benefit from the curb cut and handicapped ramp area where plaintiff fell because the area was accessible and used by the general public, and there was no evidence that the curb cut and ramp were installed by Bronx Lebanon or its predecessor or at its behest (see Trent-Clark, 114 AD3d at 558-559).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.R, Sweeny, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Ruben Franco, J.), entered on or about March 24, 2016, which granted defendant Bronx Lebanon Medical Center’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Although a landowner is responsible for maintaining abutting sidewalks (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 7-210), it is not responsible for the curbs or ramps (see Gary v 101 Owners Corp., 89 AD3d 627 [1st Dept 2011]; Administrative Code § 19-101 [d]), unless a defect thereon was created by the landowner or occurred because of a special use (see Trent-Clark v City of New York, 114 AD3d 558 [1st Dept 2014]). The duty to maintain an area of special use is not dependent on a finding that the landowner actually installed or repaired the area, only that it derived the special benefit (see Karr v City of New York, 161 AD2d 449 [1st Dept 1990]).

The court properly concluded that Bronx Lebanon did not derive a special benefit from the curb cut and handicapped ramp area where plaintiff fell because the area was accessible and used by the general public, and there was no evidence that the curb cut and ramp were installed by Bronx Lebanon or its predecessor or at its behest (see Trent-Clark, 114 AD3d at 558-559).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.R, Sweeny, Andrias, Webber and Gesmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2016 NY Slip Op 7857, 144 A.D.3d 566, 40 N.Y.S.3d 897, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lebron-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack