Kami Etemadi v. Merrick Garland

Ninth Circuit

Kami Etemadi v. Merrick Garland

36 F.4th 1238

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 2022

Docket18-72318

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 36 F.4th 1238 (Kami Etemadi v. Merrick Garland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kami Etemadi v. Merrick Garland, 36 F.4th 1238 (9th Cir. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KAMI ETEMADI, No. 18-72318 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A074-808-492

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.

Filed June 23, 2022

Before: Mary H. Murguia, Chief Judge, and Danny J. Boggs * and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges.

Order

* The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. 2 ETEMADI V. GARLAND

The petition for panel rehearing, Dkt. No. 53, is granted. The opinion filed on September 9, 2021, and reported at 12 F.4th 1013, is withdrawn. Dkt. No. 48.

The case is stayed and referred to mediation. If mediation is unsuccessful, the stay will be lifted, and the panel will determine whether to issue a final disposition or order additional argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 40(a)(4).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI