J.W. v. State

832 So. 2d 206, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17786, 2002 WL 31696698
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 4, 2002·No. No. 2D01-4522·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

COVINGTON, Judge.

J.W. appeals his adjudication and commitment after he was found guilty of accessory after the fact and felony fleeing and eluding. We find merit to one issue raised on appeal. The trial court disposed of both offenses in one disposition order. This court has held that “[w]hen multiple offenses constitute the basis of a delinquency adjudication, the trial court must enter a separate disposition order for each offense.” A.B. v. State, 805 So.2d 924, 925 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (citing P.J.C. v. State, 730 So.2d 791, 792 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)). Therefore, we affirm J.W.’s adjudication, reverse the disposition order, and remand for the trial court to enter a separate disposition order for each offense.

Affirmed in part, reversed, and remanded.

FULMER and SILBERMAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

J.W. v. State, 832 So. 2d 206, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 17786, 2002 WL 31696698 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

832 So. 2d 206 (J.W. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bogan v. State
832 So. 2d 206 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)