P.J.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

P.J.C. v. State

730 So. 2d 791, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3858

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 26, 1999·No. No. 98-01944·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

P.J.C. appeals his adjudication and commitment after he violated community control. Of the several issues raised, only his challenge to the disposition order has merit. When multiple offenses constitute the basis for a delinquency adjudication, the trial court must enter a separate disposition order for each offense. See A.V.B. v. State, 715 So.2d 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Therefore, we affirm P.J.C.’s adjudication, reverse the disposition order, and remand for the trial court to enter a separate order of disposition for each offense.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

P.J.C. appeals his adjudication and commitment after he violated community control. Of the several issues raised, only his challenge to the disposition order has merit. When multiple offenses constitute the basis for a delinquency adjudication, the trial court must enter a separate disposition order for each offense. See A.V.B. v. State, 715 So.2d 954 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). Therefore, we affirm P.J.C.’s adjudication, reverse the disposition order, and remand for the trial court to enter a separate order of disposition for each offense.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

FULMER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and NORTHCUTT, JJ., Concur.

P.J.C. v. State, 730 So. 2d 791, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 3858 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

730 So. 2d 791 (P.J.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related