Julia McCain Lampkin-Asam v. The Supreme Court of Florida

601 F.2d 760, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 12215
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 1979
Docket79-1146
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 601 F.2d 760 (Julia McCain Lampkin-Asam v. The Supreme Court of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julia McCain Lampkin-Asam v. The Supreme Court of Florida, 601 F.2d 760, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 12215 (5th Cir. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Naming “The Supreme Court of Florida” as respondent, petitioner filed in the Southern District of Florida a “Petition to Reverse Decision of Case No. 54,134.” Case No. 54,134 was a Petition for Writ of Mandamus addressed to the Florida Supreme Court asking it to direct the intermediate appellate court to reinstate an appeal which had been dismissed as not timely filed. The Supreme Court denied relief.

The district court correctly dismissed the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It is axiomatic that a federal district court, as a court of original jurisdiction, lacks appellate jurisdiction to review, modify, or nullify a final order of a state court. 28 U.S.C. § 1257(3). See Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, 398 U.S. 281, 296, 90 S.Ct. 1739, 26 L.Ed.2d 234 (1970).

This Court has held on numerous occasions that federal district courts do not have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or any other theory to reverse or modify the judgments of state courts. Cheramie v. Tucker, 493 F.2d 586, 589 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 868, 95 S.Ct. 126, 42 L.Ed.2d 107 (1974); Hill v. McClellan, 490 F.2d 859, 860 (5th Cir. 1974); Carter v. Duggan, 455 F.2d 1156, 1158 (5th Cir. 1972); Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp., 441 F.2d 536 (5th Cir. 1971); O’Connor v. O’Connor, 315 F.2d 420, 422 (5th Cir. 1963); Hanna v. Home Insurance Co., 281 F.2d 298, 303 (5th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 838, 81 S.Ct. 751, 5 L.Ed.2d 747 (1961); Williams v. Tooke, 108 F.2d 758, 759 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 311 U.S. 655, 61 S.Ct. 8, 85 L.Ed. 419 (1940).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morgan v. Morgan-Parker
E.D. Louisiana, 2024
Villarreal v. CPS
N.D. Texas, 2023
Logan v. Hennigan
N.D. Texas, 2021
In Re Nazu, Inc.
350 B.R. 304 (S.D. Texas, 2006)
Richard v. Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group, Inc.
208 F.R.D. 575 (E.D. Texas, 2002)
Diaz v. Moore
861 F. Supp. 1041 (N.D. Florida, 1994)
Keating v. Rhode Island
785 F. Supp. 1094 (D. Rhode Island, 1992)
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Sellards
731 F. Supp. 1300 (N.D. Texas, 1990)
Hatfield v. Huff
706 F. Supp. 887 (M.D. Georgia, 1989)
Murray v. Leach
535 F. Supp. 765 (E.D. Texas, 1981)
Switlik v. Hardwicke Co.
651 F.2d 852 (Third Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
601 F.2d 760, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 12215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julia-mccain-lampkin-asam-v-the-supreme-court-of-florida-ca5-1979.