Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.
441 F.2d 536, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10391
Opinion
Peter Aris has appealed from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for review of an order of the Florida Supreme Court denying certiorari. The district court correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., 1257(3); Iacaponi v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, W.D.Pa.1966, 258 F.Supp. 880, 884, affirmed 379 F.2d 311, cert. denied 1968, 389 U.S. 1054, 88 S.Ct. 802, 19 L.Ed.2d 849. The order appealed from is due to be and is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp., 441 F.2d 536, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10391 (5th Cir. 1971).
441 F.2d 536 (Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Murray v. Leach
535 F. Supp. 765 (E.D. Texas, 1981)
Gresham Park Community Organization, Simon E. Parker, MacY B. Lee and Calvin E. Sims v. Gary Howell D/B/A Southeast Package Number Two
652 F.2d 1227 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Susan Joyce Dasher v. The Supreme Court of Texas, Etc.
650 F.2d 711 (Fifth Circuit, 1981)
Julia McCain Lampkin-Asam v. The Supreme Court of Florida
601 F.2d 760 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)