Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.

Fifth Circuit

Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.

441 F.2d 536, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10391

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 4, 1971

DocketNo. 31149

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 441 F.2d 536 (Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Aris v. Big Ten Taxi Corp., 441 F.2d 536, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10391 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Peter Aris has appealed from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for review of an order of the Florida Supreme Court denying certiorari. The district court correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., 1257(3); Iacaponi v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, W.D.Pa.1966, 258 F.Supp. 880, 884, affirmed 379 F.2d 311, cert. denied 1968, 389 U.S. 1054, 88 S.Ct. 802, 19 L.Ed.2d 849. The order appealed from is due to be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Peter Aris has appealed from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for review of an order of the Florida Supreme Court denying certiorari. The district court correctly held that it lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the suit. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 et seq., 1257(3); Iacaponi v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company, W.D.Pa.1966, 258 F.Supp. 880, 884, affirmed 379 F.2d 311, cert. denied 1968, 389 U.S. 1054, 88 S.Ct. 802, 19 L.Ed.2d 849. The order appealed from is due to be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

441 F.2d 536, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aris-v-big-ten-taxi-corp-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack