Home/Supreme Court/Judy Procaccini v. Clarence Jones

Judy Procaccini v. Clarence Jones

414 U.S. 951, 94 S. Ct. 287, 38 L. Ed. 2d 205, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1077
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 23, 1973
Docket73-212
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 414 U.S. 951 (Judy Procaccini v. Clarence Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Judy Procaccini v. Clarence Jones, 414 U.S. 951, 94 S. Ct. 287, 38 L. Ed. 2d 205, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1077 (1973).

Opinions

Appeal from Ct. Civ. App. Tex., 11th Sup. Jud. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that the Fourteenth and First Amendments prohibit state obscenity regulation, would vacate judgment below and remand for further proceedings consistent with his dissent in Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

US Airways, Inc. v. O'DONNELL
627 F.3d 1318 (Tenth Circuit, 2010)
US Airways, Inc. v. O'DONNELL
706 F. Supp. 2d 1135 (D. New Mexico, 2009)
Opinion of the Justices
647 A.2d 1104 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1994)
L.B. LOVELACE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
813 F.2d 55 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)
State v. Evangelista
353 S.E.2d 375 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1987)
Held v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
101 F.R.D. 420 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Sentner v. Amtrak
540 F. Supp. 557 (D. New Jersey, 1982)
Goldstein v. Miller
488 F. Supp. 156 (D. Maryland, 1980)
State of New Mexico v. Morton
406 F. Supp. 1237 (D. New Mexico, 1975)
National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Harris
490 F.2d 572 (Tenth Circuit, 1974)
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, A/K/A Amtrak v. Curtis P. Harris, District Attorney, District No. 7, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, Charles J. Davis and Catherine L. Nuckolls, Intervening v. Weldon E. Davis, Director, Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, Soonersphere Club Association, an Unincorporated Association, and Ruby Boyd v. Curtis P. Harris, District Attorney, Disrict No. 7, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma, With Sooner Alcohol-Narcotics Education, Inc., a Corporation, and Ross J. McLennan Amicus-Curiae
490 F.2d 572 (Tenth Circuit, 1974)
Judy Procaccini v. Clarence Jones
414 U.S. 951 (Supreme Court, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 U.S. 951, 94 S. Ct. 287, 38 L. Ed. 2d 205, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1077, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/judy-procaccini-v-clarence-jones-scotus-1973.