Juda v. Solazzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Juda v. Solazzo

66 A.D.3d 1529, 885 N.Y.S.2d 924

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 9, 2009

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 66 A.D.3d 1529 (Juda v. Solazzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Juda v. Solazzo, 66 A.D.3d 1529, 885 N.Y.S.2d 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered April 4, 2008 in an action for breach of fiduciary duty. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Andrew Donovan to compel disclosure.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Juda v Solazzo (66 AD3d 1528 [2009]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Martoche, Centra, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered April 4, 2008 in an action for breach of fiduciary duty. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Andrew Donovan to compel disclosure.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Juda v Solazzo (66 AD3d 1528 [2009]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Martoche, Centra, Green and Gorski, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

66 A.D.3d 1529, 885 N.Y.S.2d 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juda-v-solazzo-nyappdiv-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack