Juda v. Solazzo
66 A.D.3d 1529, 885 N.Y.S.2d 924
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Juda v. Solazzo. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 A.D.3d 1528 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 9, 2009·No. Appeal No. 2·Published
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered April 4, 2008 in an action for breach of fiduciary duty. The order, inter alia, denied the motion of defendant Andrew Donovan to compel disclosure.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Juda v Solazzo (66 AD3d 1528 [2009]). Present—Hurlbutt, J.P, Martoche, Centra, Green and Gorski, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Juda v. Solazzo, 66 A.D.3d 1529, 885 N.Y.S.2d 924 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).
66 A.D.3d 1529 (Juda v. Solazzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Juda v. Solazzo
66 A.D.3d 1528 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)