Juan Gutierrez v. Percy Mezacamayo

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 2021
DocketA21A0711
StatusPublished

This text of Juan Gutierrez v. Percy Mezacamayo (Juan Gutierrez v. Percy Mezacamayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juan Gutierrez v. Percy Mezacamayo, (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ February 12, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21A0711. JUAN GUTIERREZ v. PERCY MEZACAMAYO.

In this civil action, plaintiff Juan Gutierrez filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s order granting defendant Percy Mezacamayo’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement. We lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.” An order granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement “is not final until the trial court expressly enters final judgment on that order.” Thomas v. Sheppard, 349 Ga. App. 871, 871 (827 SE2d 60) (2019) (punctuation omitted). Thus, “notwithstanding the trial court’s grant of a motion to enforce a settlement, a case is not at an end until such time as the agreement has been made the judgment of the court, thereby terminating the litigation.” Torres v. Elkin, 317 Ga. App. 135, 139 (1) (730 SE2d 518) (2012) (punctuation omitted); accord Underwood v. Underwood, 282 Ga. 643, 644 (1) (651 SE2d 736) (2007). Here, the record contains no indication that the trial court has entered a final judgment and made the settlement agreement the judgment of the court. Consequently, because no final judgment has been entered, Gutierrez was required to follow the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – to appeal the order granting the defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989). His failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Thomas, 349 Ga. App. at 872. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 02/12/2021 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. Sheppard.
827 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2019)
Underwood v. Underwood
651 S.E.2d 736 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
Boyd v. State
383 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)
Torres v. Elkin
730 S.E.2d 518 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juan Gutierrez v. Percy Mezacamayo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juan-gutierrez-v-percy-mezacamayo-gactapp-2021.