Juan Enriquez v. Rick Thaler

Opinion

^o. {'irW-oooiL-cs/ [ruedmCOURTCFappeal] 12th Court of Appeals District

For the twelfth oisttkt or texg^HY s. lusk,

v: £»ck thaler, fefftLj

TOTi-fe ^^aRAiSLG or qDC-EX DF*SfMD <-0«^T; p-pftllpot^uAix fcrtv^M"-, moves -Kc Coctr*"W* IcAufe to fHd Prppc\le^(5 Rc^jly Bv'.rf *A?ck is i^ 4Kis ^rf, r, D<«/wW 32, 1«>I^

ps^(( £c«*\fcyS Icof/y. On a.

av^^y 21} 2ois: He ^m^w -ttK^ rrVcW/ c/A;^ o t^k',.^ rVveollCAfvDO-. He U^PkS n&ttKUki'/Tj cfovly tW- +hr*t W<2ek3,

•6^^ 14dU- Ar^/U/rli Wo^ my ^ ^;^

P^pp^ Af^ly^^ir pWct P> dot?y o4~ the nr\o4'iO/7 to t^nrsjy^ \/e/^ t^A'/d, R^'W u,a, ^ W|t 4 ctkv, ^ ^^ ^ +> ^c Wb j^, ftfp,ll««f ^ ^ A£,„ ^ R^V ^ +- *<*,< V^ v™,W*, „,* ** TT7"

%MWs uA|l not be p^j^lc^- ~t*y A*y ' 3

hi/vi

«^^specW

fkl t^-^W'^ rWof^O 'to/ lo^/c 4t?

flW ^Ysk**) 4>Q*h*y. przee; J, by HW Cfe^ flfl^W ^ddreSSn/^ dcrlc, Twti^ £W+o4 &ppeM; \SH W^jrt r^Std^y;^ 3$"^ ry'^iv -757*4. £y*chtW 0/7 m^/c^ z^a^s: