Juan Enriquez v. Rick Thaler

Opinion

_T/J TW"^ CO

FILED IN COURT OF APPEALS —\2iH Court of Appeals nis'rict

O UA^ EK^MG^ut-£_ Arf>ptil«^--j-

F\ PP< Il«cS,

OKJ OIRiCT ^Pf c-A<_ £=^6)^ -)WE "3l<^> ^S1**" C«A-<- OiSTfZ-tc]

T° "tUt W&»JD*-f««u= Judges ot= cSft»D C&wjcT:

1-*LS Rfepc-y Gfiifcfr SHooOwt- AS ^oclo^j>S"

P^Ppcc^g*^ !F\ce\> TMfcirt. I3>»2-!G-p- O^ D&cemvsey- 2-*1-, 2.o;iM, ^T 1>W Tlwt fVppsxtAVt Whs ^"tiFFEci^c- rfct*^ A^u-T€ \<\otJ£y F^iCutc Pwp Coucd »^e>T f^MucTib/u ^SP^f\/^7ct- £\PPfcU_fWT U^^rS l=VD IM TT«TE> Al~ 3^>V-W S&&cy Hc^P/T^

T"** TO p^^ WlJffferL7 ^^

\)

2--2-11 •2-'2-

3^> 3~^*W ^^fLf qx-te^ Cfen.t7fy T/-4-0T ^ C0***aQ Coey oc

cXS,m.ch<-, posf&^e (Pe^^/n^ O *^ XJ^^^^y F0/ 2.0/57 £^/t^j^ to YZntA/JP nA.W& £^>^^ fto.joft JZjftf