Joyner v. Angelone

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joyner v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 F. App'x 829
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2003·No. 02-7309·Unpublished

Opinion

Panel rehearing granted by order filed 6/26/03 UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7309

KENNETH BRIAN JOYNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (CA-01-1189-AM)

Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: May 21, 2003

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Brian Joyner, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Brian Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

(2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons

stated by the district court that Joyner has not made a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Joyner v.

Angelone, No. CA-01-1189-AM (E.D. Va. filed June 14, 2002 & entered

June 17, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joyner v. Angelone, (4th Cir. 2003).

Joyner v. Angelone (Joyner v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)