Joyner v. Angelone

63 F. App'x 173
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 2003
DocketNo. 02-7309
StatusPublished

This text of 63 F. App'x 173 (Joyner v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joyner v. Angelone, 63 F. App'x 173 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Brian Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Joyner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Joyner v. Angelone, No. CA-01-1189-AM (E.D. Va. filed June 14, 2002 & entered June 17, 2002). Ac[174]*174cordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Appeal
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 F. App'x 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joyner-v-angelone-ca4-2003.