Joyner v. Angelone

69 F. App'x 153
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Joyner v. Angelone. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 F. App'x 829
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2003·No. 02-7309·Unpublished

Opinion

opinion

PER CURIAM.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Kenneth Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court dismissed Joyner’s petition in an order entered on June 17, 2002, and Joyner mailed a misdirected notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on July 15, 2002. Joyner discovered his mistake, and on August 15, 2002, within the period of time applicable to a determination of excusable neglect under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), Joyner mailed a motion to this court seeking to amend his notice of appeal to reflect the appropriate court. We forwarded the motion to the district court. See Fed. R.App. P. 4(d). We construe this motion as one expressing Joyner’s desire to preserve his appeal. See Myers v. Stephenson, 781 F.2d 1036, 1038-39 (4th Cir.1986). Accordingly, because the district court has not ruled on Joyner’s motion, we remand to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting that court to determine whether Joyner has shown excusable neglect warranting an extension of the ap *154 peal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joyner v. Angelone, 69 F. App'x 153 (4th Cir. 2003).

69 F. App'x 153 (Joyner v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related