Joyner v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit

Joyner v. Angelone

2 F. App'x 350

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2001·No. 00-7357·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Danny Lee Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Joyner v. Angelone, No. CA-00-1242-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Danny Lee Joyner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Joyner v. Angelone, No. CA-00-1242-AM (E.D.Va. Aug. 21, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Joyner v. Angelone, 2 F. App'x 350 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

2 F. App'x 350 (Joyner v. Angelone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related