Joseph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Joseph v. State

578 So. 2d 910, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 1991 WL 82535

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 21, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2782

StatusPublished

This text of 578 So. 2d 910 (Joseph v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Joseph v. State, 578 So. 2d 910, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 1991 WL 82535 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for cocaine trafficking. Based on [911]*911our inspection of the record and the state’s confession of error, we vacate the sentence entered on the defendant’s additional conviction of cocaine possession. Defendant was sentenced to eight years for this third-degree felony when the maximum guidelines sentence for such an offense is five years. § 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). Accordingly, we remand for proper sentencing on the possession conviction,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence for cocaine trafficking. Based on [911]*911our inspection of the record and the state’s confession of error, we vacate the sentence entered on the defendant’s additional conviction of cocaine possession. Defendant was sentenced to eight years for this third-degree felony when the maximum guidelines sentence for such an offense is five years. § 775.082(3)(d), Fla.Stat. (1989). Accordingly, we remand for proper sentencing on the possession conviction,

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

578 So. 2d 910, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 5242, 1991 WL 82535, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.