Joseph v. State

550 So. 2d 1134, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1534, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3607, 1989 WL 68966
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 1989·No. No. 87-2625·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was charged with first-degree murder. The state waived the death penalty; however, the defendant did not waive his right to a twelve-person jury. We reverse the defendant’s conviction and remand the cause to the trial court for a new trial on the authority of Mustelier v. State, 550 So.2d 1124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Rodriguez-Acosta v. State, 548 So.2d 248 [1135]*1135(Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Griffith v. State, 548 So.2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); and Jones v. State, 548 So.2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

IS A TWELVE-PERSON JURY REQUIRED IN A FIRST-DEGREE MURDER CASE IN WHICH THE PROSECUTION WAIVES THE DEATH PENALTY?

Reversed and remanded for a new trial; question certified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph v. State, 550 So. 2d 1134, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1534, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3607, 1989 WL 68966 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

550 So. 2d 1134 (Joseph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Joseph
561 So. 2d 534 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Enriquez v. State
561 So. 2d 1189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)