Joseph v. State

608 So. 2d 585, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12920, 1992 WL 342017
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 25, 1992·No. No. 92-0598·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Earl Joseph appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his community control. Appellant received community con[586]*586trol for ms conviction of purchasing cocaine. The trial court revoked his community control after a hearing on the state’s affidavit of violation and sentenced appellant to four (4) years in prison.

Although the grounds for violation stated in paragraph one of the trial court’s Amended Warrant would not be sufficient to revoke appellant’s community control, we hold that the remaining grounds do constitute a valid basis for revocation. See Warren v. State, 499 So.2d 55 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), Jones v. State, 479 So.2d 285 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), and Haynes v. State, 571 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we affirm.

DELL, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Joseph v. State, 608 So. 2d 585, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12920, 1992 WL 342017 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 585 (Joseph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quinones v. State
889 So. 2d 968 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)