Joseph Kelly v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 2025
DocketA25A0860
StatusPublished

This text of Joseph Kelly v. State (Joseph Kelly v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Joseph Kelly v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 15, 2025

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0860. JOSEPH KELLY v. THE STATE.

Joseph Kelly, who is facing criminal prosecution for computer invasion of privacy, has filed multiple pre-trial motions.1 On October 11, 2024, the trial court entered three orders addressing the motions, and Kelly seeks to appeal these rulings. We, however, lack jurisdiction. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1), appeals generally may be taken from “[a]ll final judgments, that is to say, where the case is no longer pending in the court below.” Because this action remains pending before the trial court, Kelly was required to use the interlocutory appeal procedures – including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court – to obtain review of the order he seeks to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Boyd v. State, 191 Ga. App. 435, 435 (383 SE2d 906) (1989).

1 Kelly’s appointed counsel was permitted to withdraw, and the trial court has scheduled a Faretta hearing to address Kelly’s request for self-representation. See Faretta v. California, 422 U. S. 806 (95 SCt 2525, 45 LE2d 562) (1975). Kelly’s failure to comply with the interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction over this premature direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Boyd, 191 Ga. App. at 435.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/15/2025 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Faretta v. California
422 U.S. 806 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Boyd v. State
383 S.E.2d 906 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Joseph Kelly v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/joseph-kelly-v-state-gactapp-2025.