Jose Eduardo Castillo v. State
This text of Jose Eduardo Castillo v. State (Jose Eduardo Castillo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-12-00391-CR
JOSE EDUARDO CASTILLO, Appellant v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 10-02592-CRF-272
ORDER
The State’s brief was due January 27, 2014. An amended motion for extension of
time to file the State’s brief was filed on January 28, 2014.1 The State requested an
extension of time until January 31, 2014 to file its brief. The State’s amended motion is
granted. Having granted the amended motion to the date requested, the State’s brief
was due January 31, 2014. It has not been filed.
1Because the amended motion supersedes the original motion, the original motion will be deactivated on the Court’s docket, and thus, the Court will not rule on it. Accordingly, the State’s brief or a request for extension of time to file the brief
must be filed within 28 days from the date of this order. The State is warned, however,
that the failure to file a brief may result in confession of error by the State. See State v.
Fielder, 376 S.W.3d 784, 785 (Tex. App.—Waco 2011, no pet.).
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Amended motion granted Order issued and filed February 20, 2014
Castillo v. State Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Jose Eduardo Castillo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jose-eduardo-castillo-v-state-texapp-2014.