Jose Eduardo Castillo v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 2014·No. 10-12-00391-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-12-00391-CR

JOSE EDUARDO CASTILLO, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the 272nd District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 10-02592-CRF-272

ORDER

The State’s brief was due January 27, 2014. An amended motion for extension of

time to file the State’s brief was filed on January 28, 2014.1 The State requested an

extension of time until January 31, 2014 to file its brief. The State’s amended motion is

granted. Having granted the amended motion to the date requested, the State’s brief

was due January 31, 2014. It has not been filed.

1Because the amended motion supersedes the original motion, the original motion will be deactivated on the Court’s docket, and thus, the Court will not rule on it. Accordingly, the State’s brief or a request for extension of time to file the brief

must be filed within 28 days from the date of this order. The State is warned, however,

that the failure to file a brief may result in confession of error by the State. See State v.

Fielder, 376 S.W.3d 784, 785 (Tex. App.—Waco 2011, no pet.).

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Amended motion granted Order issued and filed February 20, 2014

Castillo v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jose Eduardo Castillo v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Jose Eduardo Castillo v. State (Jose Eduardo Castillo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Melanie Dawn Fielder
376 S.W.3d 784 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2011)