Jordan v. State

796 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14207, 2001 WL 1192199
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jordan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 728 So. 2d 748
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 10, 2001·No. No. 3D01-97·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the State’s proper confession of error, we vacate defendant’s amended sentence in case number 96-13156 and remand for resentencing. When the trial court resentenced defendant in August 2000 pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), it committed fundamental error in entering the amended sentence in defendant’s absence and without holding a sentencing hearing, as the resentencing required more than a ministerial act. See Ingram v. State, 789 So.2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that where defendant’s original sentence was above sentence that could be imposed without departure under 1994 guidelines, resentencing that involved more than ministerial act was required); Dougherty v. State, 785 So.2d 1221 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)(holding that resentencing defendant in absentia and without holding hearing amounts to fundamental error when resen-[639]*639tencing requires more than ministerial act).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan v. State, 796 So. 2d 638, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 14207, 2001 WL 1192199 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

796 So. 2d 638 (Jordan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dougherty v. State
785 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Ingram v. State
789 So. 2d 430 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)