Jordan v. State

775 So. 2d 310, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452, 2000 WL 192143
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jordan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 728 So. 2d 748
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 2000·No. No. 2D98-4437·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Clarence Jordan challenges his judgments and sentences for possession of cocaine and possession of [311]*311paraphernalia. We affirm both convictions and the sentence imposed for possession of cocaine. The written sentence for the possession of paraphernalia conviction fails to conform with the sentence that was orally pronounced, specifically, time served. Accordingly, we direct the trial court to correct that sentence. Jordan need not be present for this correction.

Affirmed in part; remanded with directions to correct sentence for possession of paraphernalia.

BLUE, A.C.J., and FULMER and DAVIS, JJ, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan v. State, 775 So. 2d 310, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452, 2000 WL 192143 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

775 So. 2d 310 (Jordan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)