Jordan v. State
This text of 775 So. 2d 310 (Jordan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Clarence Jordan challenges his judgments and sentences for possession of cocaine and possession of [311]*311paraphernalia. We affirm both convictions and the sentence imposed for possession of cocaine. The written sentence for the possession of paraphernalia conviction fails to conform with the sentence that was orally pronounced, specifically, time served. Accordingly, we direct the trial court to correct that sentence. Jordan need not be present for this correction.
Affirmed in part; remanded with directions to correct sentence for possession of paraphernalia.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
775 So. 2d 310, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 1452, 2000 WL 192143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordan-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.