Jordan v. Middlesex Railroad
138 Mass. 425, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 210
Opinion
W. Allen, J.
The instructions given state clearly the correct rule of damages, and contain all that the defendant asked for, except the proposition, which the court properly refused to give to the jury, that the earnings of the plaintiff belonged to her husband. See Pub. Sts. c. 147, § 4.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jordan v. Middlesex Railroad, 138 Mass. 425, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 210 (Mass. 1885).
138 Mass. 425 (Jordan v. Middlesex Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matloff v. City of Chelsea
31 N.E.2d 518 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Green
1923 OK 319 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Gregory v. Oakland Motor Car Co.
147 N.W. 614 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)
Enid City Ry. Co. v. Reynolds
1912 OK 493 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Vélez v. Llavina
18 P.R. 634 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1912)
Millmore v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
84 N.E. 468 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Becker v. Lincoln Real Estate & Building Co.
93 S.W. 291 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1906)
Nolin v. Pearson
77 N.E. 890 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
Perrigo v. City of St. Louis
84 S.W. 30 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
L. W. Pomerene Co. v. White
97 N.W. 232 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1903)
Southern Railway Co. v. Crowder
135 Ala. 417 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1902)
Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. Young
30 Colo. 349 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1902)
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. Humble
97 F. 837 (Eighth Circuit, 1899)
Harmon v. Old Colony Railroad
42 N.E. 505 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Hamilton v. Great Falls Street Railway Co.
43 P. 713 (Montana Supreme Court, 1895)