Jordan v. Arizona Ex Rel. Nelson
396 U.S. 5, 90 S. Ct. 24, 24 L. Ed. 2d 4, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 786
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jordan v. Arizona Ex Rel. Nelson, 396 U.S. 5, 90 S. Ct. 24, 24 L. Ed. 2d 4, 1969 U.S. LEXIS 786 (1969).
396 U.S. 5 (Jordan v. Arizona Ex Rel. Nelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Comptroller of the Treasury v. Hickey
689 A.2d 1316 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1997)
Mathieu v. Mahoney
851 P.2d 81 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1993)
Stevens v. State Tax Assessor
571 A.2d 1195 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1990)
Aronov v. Secretary of Revenue
355 S.E.2d 854 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1987)
United States v. Kansas
810 F.2d 935 (Tenth Circuit, 1987)
United States v. State of Kansas
810 F.2d 935 (Tenth Circuit, 1987)
Salorio v. Glaser
461 A.2d 1100 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
644 P.2d 1266 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1982)
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Conway
514 F. Supp. 1341 (D. Vermont, 1981)
Rubin v. Glaser
416 A.2d 382 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)
Hood v. State
539 P.2d 931 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1975)
Blawis v. Bolin
358 F. Supp. 349 (D. Arizona, 1973)
Caruth v. Mariani
463 P.2d 83 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1970)