Shapiro v. Solman
396 U.S. 5, 24 L. Ed. 2d 5
Opinion
SHAPIRO, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
SOLMAN ET AL.
Supreme Court of United States.
Robert K. Killian, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Francis J. MacGregor, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Francis X. Dineen for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. See King v. Smith, 392 U. S. 309.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shapiro v. Solman, 396 U.S. 5, 24 L. Ed. 2d 5 (1969).
396 U.S. 5 (Shapiro v. Solman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Francis v. Davidson
340 F. Supp. 351 (D. Maryland, 1972)
Green v. Dept. of Institutions and Agencies
263 A.2d 796 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1970)
Jordan v. Arizona Ex Rel. Nelson
396 U.S. 5 (Supreme Court, 1969)