Jones v. Stansberry

212 F. App'x 251

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens * complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis trict court. Jones v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-ct-03012-D (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

* Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).