Jones v. Stansberry

308 F. App'x 700
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 2009
DocketNo, 08-7724
StatusPublished

This text of 308 F. App'x 700 (Jones v. Stansberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Stansberry, 308 F. App'x 700 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Edward B. Jones, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s orders construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition as a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2008) motion and dismissing it, and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Jones v. Stansberry, No. 1:08-cv-00713-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. filed July 21, 2008; entered July 23, 2008 & Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
308 F. App'x 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-stansberry-ca4-2009.