Jones v. Stansberry

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 30, 2005
Docket04-7820
StatusUnpublished

This text of Jones v. Stansberry (Jones v. Stansberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Stansberry, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7820

OZZIE JONES, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-603)

Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 30, 2005

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ozzie Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ozzie Jones, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See Jones v. Stansberry, No. CA-04-603

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Jones v. Stansberry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-stansberry-ca4-2005.