Jones v. Chandler

76 S.E.2d 239, 88 Ga. App. 105, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 1021
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 2, 1953
Docket34534
StatusPublished

This text of 76 S.E.2d 239 (Jones v. Chandler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jones v. Chandler, 76 S.E.2d 239, 88 Ga. App. 105, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 1021 (Ga. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

Sutton, C. J.

The question in this case is identical with the question involved in Jones v. Chandler, ante, and this case is controlled by the ruling there made.

Judgment affirmed.

Felton and Worrill, JJ., concur. Nall & Sterne, Haas, Hurt & Peek, A. Paul Cadenhead, for plaintiff in error. Poole, Pearce &'Hall, C. A. Herbig, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 S.E.2d 239, 88 Ga. App. 105, 1953 Ga. App. LEXIS 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jones-v-chandler-gactapp-1953.