Morris v. George

59 S.E. 1116, 3 Ga. App. 413, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 163
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1908
Docket788
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 59 S.E. 1116 (Morris v. George) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. George, 59 S.E. 1116, 3 Ga. App. 413, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 163 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

Powell, J.

The administrator’s bond sued on in this case was executed by Messrs. Morris, as principals, and the National Surety Company of New York, as surety. The administrators reside in DeKalb county, the surety company in New York; but it has an office and an agency in Fulton county, though not in DeKalb county, where the decedent resided at the time of his death. The suit was located in Fulton county. The point is made that ’the courts of Fulton county were without jurisdiction, that venue was confined to DeKalb county. Taken together, the decisions in the cases of Reeves v. Southern Ry. Co., 121 Ga. 561 (49 S. E. 674), Equity Life Asso. v. Gammon, 119 Ga. 271 (46 S. E. 100), and Southern Ry. Co. v. Grizzle, 124 Ga. 735 (53 S. E. 244, 110 Am. St. R. 191), seem to necessitate the conclusion that where residents [414]*414and non-residents are joint obligors, the suit against them may be brought in any county in the State in which jurisdiction can be obtained oyer the non-resident defendant. See also Saffold v. Scottish American Co., 98 Ga. 785, 787 (27 S. E. 208). In this case the non-resident defendant is a fidelity-insuranee company, .and venue of suits against such companies may be laid according to section 2145 of the Civil Code; and section 2144 is merely cumulative. See also §§2008, 2057. The city court of Atlanta properly took jurisdiction. There is no merit in the other exceptions appearing in the record. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bergen v. Martindale-Hubbell, Inc.
267 S.E.2d 10 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1980)
Nelson Associates, Ltd. v. Grubbs
219 S.E.2d 607 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Williamson v. Perret's Farms, Inc.
197 S.E.2d 754 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1973)
Jones v. Chandler
76 S.E.2d 237 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Carlan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
189 S.E. 527 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
American Surety Co. v. Smallon
186 S.E. 892 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Gross v. Butler
173 S.E. 866 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
National Surety Co. v. Seymour
166 S.E. 777 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1932)
Georgia Creosoting Co. v. Moody
154 S.E. 294 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.E. 1116, 3 Ga. App. 413, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-george-gactapp-1908.