Jones v. Acker
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn eK SHELLY JONES; WARREN JONES, Plaintiffs, -against- 24 CIVIL 7904 (LLS) JUDGMENT JUDGE CHRISTI ACKER; FEIN, SUCH, & CRAIN LLP; BLANK ROME; PENNYMAC LOAN SVCS, LLC, Defendants. wee K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated May 28, 2025, Plaintiffs’ amended complaint, filed IFP under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iu), (iii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Civil judgment is entered dismissing this action; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York June 2, 2025
TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerk of Court
4 LaNGO BY: K. Mange Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jones v. Acker (Jones v. Acker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.