Johnston v. Lanter
This text of 139 P. 1031 (Johnston v. Lanter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the district court sustaining the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial is affirmed on the authority of the case of Bourquin v. Railway Co., 88 Kan. 183, 127 Pac. 770, which states the practice in this state as settled by a long line of decisions.
By denying the plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the special findings and granting his motion for a new trial the court indicated dissatisfaction with the findings as well as with the general verdict, and judgment on the special findings will not be directed in favor of the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
139 P. 1031, 92 Kan. 257, 1914 Kan. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnston-v-lanter-kan-1914.