Johnson v. United States

56 F. App'x 187
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 F. App'x 113
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2003·No. 02-7387·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Henry Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion, which the district court construed as a petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Johnson has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Johnson v. United States, No. CA-99-892-7 (W.D.Va. June 20, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. United States, 56 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2003).

56 F. App'x 187 (Johnson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Appeal
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)