Johnson v. United States

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Johnson v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 50 F. App'x 113
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 2000·No. 00-6143·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6143

JOHN H. JOHNSON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-99-892)

Submitted: June 30, 2000 Decided: July 14, 2000

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Cir- cuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John H. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

John H. Johnson appeals the district court’s orders denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no re-

versible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil-

ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

See Johnson v. United States, No. CA-99-892 (W.D. Va. Dec. 9, 1999;

Feb. 16, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Johnson v. United States, (4th Cir. 2000).

Johnson v. United States (Johnson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related