Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.

Ohio Supreme Court

Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.

821 N.E.2d 1024, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1402

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 31, 2005

Docket2004-0304

StatusPublished

This text of 821 N.E.2d 1024 (Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Johnson v. Microsoft Corp., 821 N.E.2d 1024, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1402 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-020564, 156 Ohio App.3d 249, 2004-Ohio-761. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro, to participate in oral argument scheduled for February 15, 2005,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to the appellant, Maria Johnson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hamilton App. No. C-020564, 156 Ohio App.3d 249, 2004-Ohio-761. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of the motion of amicus curiae, Ohio Attorney General Jim Petro, to participate in oral argument scheduled for February 15, 2005,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to the appellant, Maria Johnson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

821 N.E.2d 1024, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/johnson-v-microsoft-corp-ohio-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack