JOHN SCHAUFLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA

255 So. 3d 929
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2018
Docket17-1444
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 255 So. 3d 929 (JOHN SCHAUFLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JOHN SCHAUFLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 255 So. 3d 929 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JOHN SCHAUFLER, DOC #H21724, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1444 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )

Opinion filed June 20, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; James A. Yancey, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge.

We affirm the trial court's revocation of John Schaufler's probation and the

sentences imposed upon revocation without further comment. We note, however, that

although the trial court recognized at the March 2017 revocation hearing that it should

not re-adjudicate Schaufler guilty of the original offenses because it had already

adjudicated him guilty of those offenses in May 2005 when originally imposing probation, see Butler v. State, 195 So. 3d 1147, 1148 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ("Duplicative

adjudications of guilt after revocation of probation or community control are superfluous,

are unauthorized, and can cause undue confusion in future proceedings."), the record

on appeal nevertheless includes a second written judgment adjudicating him guilty of

the original offenses. This judgment, which was signed the same day as the revocation

hearing and accompanies the written sentences imposed following revocation of his

probation, was entered in error. See id. at 1148-49 ("[T]he circuit court only enters a

judgment on a violation of probation in those instances when it withheld an adjudication

of guilt, i.e., withheld judgment, at the time it originally imposed probation." (quoting

Jackson v. State, 56 So. 3d 65, 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (Altenbernd, J., concurring))).

Accordingly, we affirm the revocation of Schaufler's probation and the ensuing

sentences but remand for vacatur of the March 2017 written judgment adjudicating

Schaufler guilty a second time.

Affirmed in part; remanded with instructions.

KELLY and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Hammond v. State
261 So. 3d 754 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
JAHMONTAE ALEXANDER HAMMOND v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 So. 3d 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-schaufler-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.