JAHMONTAE ALEXANDER HAMMOND v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 2019
Docket17-3705
StatusPublished

This text of JAHMONTAE ALEXANDER HAMMOND v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JAHMONTAE ALEXANDER HAMMOND v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JAHMONTAE ALEXANDER HAMMOND v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JAHMONTAE A. HAMMOND, a/k/a ) JAHMONTAE ALEXANDER HAMMOND, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3705 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________)

Opinion filed January 4, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Samantha L. Ward, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Pamela H. Izakowtiz, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katie Salemi Ashby, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Jahmontae A. Hammond appeals the order revoking his probation and the

resulting corrected sentences on five felony counts. We affirm the order revoking his probation and the corrected sentences without discussion. However, we remand for the

trial court to vacate a second judgment entered upon revocation of probation.

Hammond had originally been adjudicated guilty on the five felony counts

in 2014, and his probation was revoked in 2017. The trial court entered a revocation

order and sentences and later entered a corrected judgment and sentences.1 When a

judge originally adjudicates a defendant guilty, a second judgment upon revocation of

probation is unauthorized and can cause confusion in the future. See Fountain v. State,

249 So. 3d 786, 787 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018); Schaufler v. State, 255 So. 3d 929, 929 (Fla.

2d DCA 2018). Here, the confusion is exacerbated because the 2017 corrected

judgment contains an adjudication on a misdemeanor for count six that does not appear

in the 2014 original judgment. Therefore, we remand for the trial court to vacate the

unauthorized corrected judgment of September 13, 2017. See Fountain, 249 So. 2d at

787.

Affirmed in part and remanded with instructions.

BLACK and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

1The sentences were corrected to continue Hammond's status as a youthful offender on all counts.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JOHN SCHAUFLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
255 So. 3d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
NICHOLAS FOUNTAIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA
249 So. 3d 786 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
JAHMONTAE ALEXANDER HAMMOND v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jahmontae-alexander-hammond-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.