HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 23, 2020·No. 19-2202·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

HIRAM MARSHALL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-2202 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 23, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark F. Carpanini, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James Hellickson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order of revocation of community control and the ensuing

sentence. However, we remand for vacatur of the duplicative written judgment of guilt

that was entered on May 30, 2019. See Schaufler v. State, 255 So. 3d 929, 929 (Fla.

2d DCA 2018). Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

KHOUZAM, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA (HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

JOHN SCHAUFLER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
255 So. 3d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)