HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA (HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
HIRAM MARSHALL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-2202 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ )
Opinion filed September 23, 2020.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Mark F. Carpanini, Judge.
Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James Hellickson, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order of revocation of community control and the ensuing
sentence. However, we remand for vacatur of the duplicative written judgment of guilt
that was entered on May 30, 2019. See Schaufler v. State, 255 So. 3d 929, 929 (Fla.
2d DCA 2018). Affirmed; remanded with instructions.
KHOUZAM, C.J., and NORTHCUTT and KELLY, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
HIRAM MARSHALL v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hiram-marshall-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.