John Crim v. Neil Adler

430 F. App'x 580

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner John Michael Crim appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 1 and we affirm.

Crim contends that the district court erred by denying his habeas petition seeking immediate consideration for transfer into a Residential Reentry Center (RRC). The record reflects that the district court did not err in denying the petition because, at the time of its decision, Crim had already received an individualized consideration for RRC placement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621(b) and 3624(c), and Rodriguez v. Smith, 541 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir.2008).

Crim’s remaining contentions, to the extent they are understandable, are unavailing.

AFFIRMED.

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1 . We certify for appeal, on our own motion, the issue of whether the district court properly denied Crim’s petition.