John C. Stewart v. Waterman Steamship Corporation
This text of 409 F.2d 1045 (John C. Stewart v. Waterman Steamship Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal lies from a final judgment in favor of Waterman Steamship Corp. and Alcoa in an action for maintenance and cure. The district court found that Stewart, who served aboard the WILD RANGER and ALCOA PARTNER, vessels of Waterman and Alcoa respectively, suffers from grand mal epileptic seizures stemming from a 1945 car accident which occurred long before his service on the WILD RANGER or ALCOA PARTNER. The court also found that Stewart was an epileptic before, during, and after his employment and that, although control over the intensity of the seizures might be increased through experimentation with drugs, the seizures could never be totally eliminated.
We are unable to say that the district court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous and affirm the court’s judgment for the reasons stated in the opinion of the district judge, 288 F.Supp. 629 (1968).
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 F.2d 1045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-c-stewart-v-waterman-steamship-corporation-ca5-1969.