JM v. State

692 So. 2d 308
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1997
Docket96-1525, 96-1619
StatusPublished

This text of 692 So. 2d 308 (JM v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JM v. State, 692 So. 2d 308 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

692 So.2d 308 (1997)

J.M., a child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nos. 96-1525, 96-1619.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

April 30, 1997.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Karen E. Ehrlich, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Aubin Wade Robinson, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, J.M., a minor, appeals his adjudication as a delinquent for aggravated assault of a police officer and burglary of a conveyance and his commitment to a level six residential facility. We affirm appellant's convictions and his adjudication as a delinquent.

The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to make requisite findings before sentencing appellant. Section 39.052(4)(e) 1., Florida Statutes (1995), formerly section 39.052(3)(e)1., provides:

If the court determines that the child should be adjudicated as having committed a delinquent act and should be committed to the department, such determination shall be in writing or on the record of the hearing. The determination shall include a specific finding of the reasons for the decision to adjudicate and to commit the child to the department.

The court's failure to make specific findings before adjudicating appellant delinquent and committing him constitutes reversible error. See J.R.C. v. State, No. 95-02560, 1997 WL 118236 (Fla. 2d DCA Mar.14, 1997); M.S.M. v. State, 639 So.2d 189, 190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for a new disposition hearing with leave to the trial court to again sentence appellant to a level six facility after providing requisite reasons for the sentence.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

GUNTHER, C.J., and DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

JRC v. State
696 So. 2d 822 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
M.S.M. v. State
639 So. 2d 189 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
J.M. v. State
692 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
692 So. 2d 308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jm-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.