F.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

F.H. v. State

700 So. 2d 177, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11565, 1997 WL 640642

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 15, 1997

DocketNo. 96-4128

StatusPublished

This text of 700 So. 2d 177 (F.H. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F.H. v. State, 700 So. 2d 177, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11565, 1997 WL 640642 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for petit theft, but remand to the trial court for a new disposition hearing with leave to the trial court to again adjudicate appellant and sentence him to a level six facility after stating on the record or in writing the reasons for such a sentence. See § 39.052(4)(e)1., Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996); see also J.M. v. State, 692 So.2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

GLICKSTEIN ’ POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for petit theft, but remand to the trial court for a new disposition hearing with leave to the trial court to again adjudicate appellant and sentence him to a level six facility after stating on the record or in writing the reasons for such a sentence. See § 39.052(4)(e)1., Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996); see also J.M. v. State, 692 So.2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

GLICKSTEIN ’ POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 So. 2d 177, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11565, 1997 WL 640642, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fh-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack