F.H. v. State

700 So. 2d 177, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11565, 1997 WL 640642
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1997·No. No. 96-4128·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction for petit theft, but remand to the trial court for a new disposition hearing with leave to the trial court to again adjudicate appellant and sentence him to a level six facility after stating on the record or in writing the reasons for such a sentence. See § 39.052(4)(e)1., Fla. Stat. (Supp.1996); see also J.M. v. State, 692 So.2d 308 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

GLICKSTEIN ’ POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

F.H. v. State, 700 So. 2d 177, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11565, 1997 WL 640642 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

700 So. 2d 177 (F.H. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J.M. v. State
692 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)