JEX v. Holder

Ninth Circuit

JEX v. Holder

668 F.3d 673, 2012 WL 360764, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 6, 2012

Docket09-74038

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 668 F.3d 673 (JEX v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

JEX v. Holder, 668 F.3d 673, 2012 WL 360764, 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 2380 (9th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinions

Order; Dissent by Judge

O’SCANNLAIN.

ORDER

Anthony Jex and Gilda Middleton have filed a petition for rehearing en banc in this matter. Petitioners have had a long-term presence in the United States and have a United States citizen daughter. It appears that petitioners are the beneficiary and derivative beneficiary of an approved 1-130 visa petition. They do not appear to have any criminal convictions.

In light of ICE Director John Morton’s June 17, 2011 memo regarding prosecutorial discretion, and the November 17, 2011 follow-up memo providing guidance to ICE Attorneys, the government shall advise the court by March 19, 2012, whether the government intends to exercise prosecutorial discretion in this case and, if so, the effect, if any, of the exercise of such discretion on any action to be taken by this court with regard to Petitioners’ pending petition for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI