Jewler v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia

Jewler v. District of Columbia

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedJuly 28, 2016

DocketCivil Action No. 2012-1843

StatusPublished

This text of Jewler v. District of Columbia (Jewler v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jewler v. District of Columbia, (D.D.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ ) SAMUEL JEWLER, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1843 (PLF) ) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion issued this same day,

it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) as

to Bank Defendants and Akridge Defendants [Dkt. 87] is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s June 21, 2016 Order [Dkt. 86] represents

its FINAL JUDGMENT regarding all claims against Bank of America, N.A. and Joseph Massey,

as well as the John Akridge Company, Phillip McGovern, Kathleen McKeon, and Judy Oakley.

This is a final appealable order. See FED. R. APP. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN DATE: July 28, 2016 United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI