Jerry Markadonatos v. Village of Woodridge

Seventh Circuit

Jerry Markadonatos v. Village of Woodridge

760 F.3d 545, 2014 WL 3566203, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13856

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided July 21, 2014·No. 12-2619·Published·Cited by 21 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The court is divided. Five judges in two groups (Judges Posner, Flaum, and Kanne in one; Judges Easterbrook and Tinder in the other) vote to affirm the judgment of the district court. Judge Sykes votes to remand with instructions to dismiss the case for want of standing to sue. The remaining four judges (Chief Judge Wood and Judges Rovner, Williams, and Hamilton) vote to reverse. Because no position commands a majority, the judgment of the district court is affirmed by our divided court. Durant v. Essex Co., 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 107, 112, 19 L.Ed. 154 (1868).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court is divided. Five judges in two groups (Judges Posner, Flaum, and Kanne in one; Judges Easterbrook and Tinder in the other) vote to affirm the judgment of the district court. Judge Sykes votes to remand with instructions to dismiss the case for want of standing to sue. The remaining four judges (Chief Judge Wood and Judges Rovner, Williams, and Hamilton) vote to reverse. Because no position commands a majority, the judgment of the district court is affirmed by our divided court. Durant v. Essex Co., 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 107, 112, 19 L.Ed. 154 (1868).

Jerry Markadonatos v. Village of Woodridge, 760 F.3d 545, 2014 WL 3566203, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13856 (7th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

760 F.3d 545 (Jerry Markadonatos v. Village of Woodridge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related