Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Jennings v. State

Jennings v. State

665 So. 2d 377, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 50, 1996 WL 1134
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 3, 1996
DocketNo. 95-0122
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 665 So. 2d 377 (Jennings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings v. State, 665 So. 2d 377, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 50, 1996 WL 1134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order revoking appellant’s probation, except that we strike the finding that appellant violated condition 14. The evidence does not support this finding. In light of appellant’s remaining, numerous violations of the probation order, we find it unnecessary to remand this cause to the trial court. See Gavins v. State, 587 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Wilson v. State, 506 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); McKeever v. State, 359 So.2d 905 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED.

DELL, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lawson v. State
941 So. 2d 485 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
665 So. 2d 377, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 50, 1996 WL 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.