Jennings v. State
665 So. 2d 377, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 50, 1996 WL 1134
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 3, 1996·No. No. 95-0122·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the order revoking appellant’s probation, except that we strike the finding that appellant violated condition 14. The evidence does not support this finding. In light of appellant’s remaining, numerous violations of the probation order, we find it unnecessary to remand this cause to the trial court. See Gavins v. State, 587 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Wilson v. State, 506 So.2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); McKeever v. State, 359 So.2d 905 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jennings v. State, 665 So. 2d 377, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 50, 1996 WL 1134 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
665 So. 2d 377 (Jennings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lawson v. State
941 So. 2d 485 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)